Queries in Cloud Firestore let you find documents in large collections. To gain insight into properties of the collection as a whole, you can aggregate data over a collection.
You can aggregate data either at read-time or at write time:
Read-time aggregations calculate a result at the time of the request. Cloud Firestore supports the
count()
,sum()
, andaverage()
aggregation queries at read-time. Read-time aggregation queries are are easier to add to your app than write-time aggregations. For more on aggregation queries, see Summarize data with aggregation queries.Write-time aggregations calculate a result each time the app performs a relevant write operation. Write-time aggregations are more work to implement, but you might use them instead of read-time aggregations for one of the following reasons:
- You want to listen to the aggregation result for real-time updates.
The
count()
,sum()
, andaverage()
aggregation queries do not support real-time updates. - You want to store the aggregation result in a client-side cache.
The
count()
,sum()
, andaverage()
aggregation queries do not support caching. - You are aggregating data from tens of thousands of documents for each of your users and consider costs. At a lower number of documents, read-time aggregations cost less. For a large number of documents in an aggregations, write-time aggregations might cost less.
- You want to listen to the aggregation result for real-time updates.
The
You can implement a write-time aggregation using either a client-side transaction or with Cloud Functions. The following sections describe how to implement write-time aggregations.
Solution: Write-time aggregation with a client-side transaction
Consider a local recommendations app that helps users find great restaurants. The following query retrieves all the ratings for a given restaurant:
Web
db.collection("restaurants") .doc("arinell-pizza") .collection("ratings") .get();
Swift
do { let snapshot = try await db.collection("restaurants") .document("arinell-pizza") .collection("ratings") .getDocuments() print(snapshot) } catch { print(error) }
Objective-C
FIRQuery *query = [[[self.db collectionWithPath:@"restaurants"] documentWithPath:@"arinell-pizza"] collectionWithPath:@"ratings"]; [query getDocumentsWithCompletion:^(FIRQuerySnapshot * _Nullable snapshot, NSError * _Nullable error) { // ... }];
Kotlin+KTX
db.collection("restaurants") .document("arinell-pizza") .collection("ratings") .get()
Java
db.collection("restaurants") .document("arinell-pizza") .collection("ratings") .get();
Rather than fetching all ratings and then computing aggregate information, we can store this information on the restaurant document itself:
Web
var arinellDoc = { name: 'Arinell Pizza', avgRating: 4.65, numRatings: 683 };
Swift
struct Restaurant { let name: String let avgRating: Float let numRatings: Int } let arinell = Restaurant(name: "Arinell Pizza", avgRating: 4.65, numRatings: 683)
Objective-C
@interface FIRRestaurant : NSObject @property (nonatomic, readonly) NSString *name; @property (nonatomic, readonly) float averageRating; @property (nonatomic, readonly) NSInteger ratingCount; - (instancetype)initWithName:(NSString *)name averageRating:(float)averageRating ratingCount:(NSInteger)ratingCount; @end @implementation FIRRestaurant - (instancetype)initWithName:(NSString *)name averageRating:(float)averageRating ratingCount:(NSInteger)ratingCount { self = [super init]; if (self != nil) { _name = name; _averageRating = averageRating; _ratingCount = ratingCount; } return self; } @end
Kotlin+KTX
data class Restaurant( // default values required for use with "toObject" internal var name: String = "", internal var avgRating: Double = 0.0, internal var numRatings: Int = 0, )
val arinell = Restaurant("Arinell Pizza", 4.65, 683)
Java
public class Restaurant { String name; double avgRating; int numRatings; public Restaurant(String name, double avgRating, int numRatings) { this.name = name; this.avgRating = avgRating; this.numRatings = numRatings; } }
Restaurant arinell = new Restaurant("Arinell Pizza", 4.65, 683);
In order to keep these aggregations consistent, they must be updated each time a new rating is added to the subcollection. One way to achieve consistency is to perform the add and the update in a single transaction:
Web
function addRating(restaurantRef, rating) { // Create a reference for a new rating, for use inside the transaction var ratingRef = restaurantRef.collection('ratings').doc(); // In a transaction, add the new rating and update the aggregate totals return db.runTransaction((transaction) => { return transaction.get(restaurantRef).then((res) => { if (!res.exists) { throw "Document does not exist!"; } // Compute new number of ratings var newNumRatings = res.data().numRatings + 1; // Compute new average rating var oldRatingTotal = res.data().avgRating * res.data().numRatings; var newAvgRating = (oldRatingTotal + rating) / newNumRatings; // Commit to Firestore transaction.update(restaurantRef, { numRatings: newNumRatings, avgRating: newAvgRating }); transaction.set(ratingRef, { rating: rating }); }); }); }
Swift
func addRatingTransaction(restaurantRef: DocumentReference, rating: Float) async { let ratingRef: DocumentReference = restaurantRef.collection("ratings").document() do { let _ = try await db.runTransaction({ (transaction, errorPointer) -> Any? in do { let restaurantDocument = try transaction.getDocument(restaurantRef).data() guard var restaurantData = restaurantDocument else { return nil } // Compute new number of ratings let numRatings = restaurantData["numRatings"] as! Int let newNumRatings = numRatings + 1 // Compute new average rating let avgRating = restaurantData["avgRating"] as! Float let oldRatingTotal = avgRating * Float(numRatings) let newAvgRating = (oldRatingTotal + rating) / Float(newNumRatings) // Set new restaurant info restaurantData["numRatings"] = newNumRatings restaurantData["avgRating"] = newAvgRating // Commit to Firestore transaction.setData(restaurantData, forDocument: restaurantRef) transaction.setData(["rating": rating], forDocument: ratingRef) } catch { // Error getting restaurant data // ... } return nil }) } catch { // ... } }
Objective-C
- (void)addRatingTransactionWithRestaurantReference:(FIRDocumentReference *)restaurant rating:(float)rating { FIRDocumentReference *ratingReference = [[restaurant collectionWithPath:@"ratings"] documentWithAutoID]; [self.db runTransactionWithBlock:^id (FIRTransaction *transaction, NSError **errorPointer) { FIRDocumentSnapshot *restaurantSnapshot = [transaction getDocument:restaurant error:errorPointer]; if (restaurantSnapshot == nil) { return nil; } NSMutableDictionary *restaurantData = [restaurantSnapshot.data mutableCopy]; if (restaurantData == nil) { return nil; } // Compute new number of ratings NSInteger ratingCount = [restaurantData[@"numRatings"] integerValue]; NSInteger newRatingCount = ratingCount + 1; // Compute new average rating float averageRating = [restaurantData[@"avgRating"] floatValue]; float newAverageRating = (averageRating * ratingCount + rating) / newRatingCount; // Set new restaurant info restaurantData[@"numRatings"] = @(newRatingCount); restaurantData[@"avgRating"] = @(newAverageRating); // Commit to Firestore [transaction setData:restaurantData forDocument:restaurant]; [transaction setData:@{@"rating": @(rating)} forDocument:ratingReference]; return nil; } completion:^(id _Nullable result, NSError * _Nullable error) { // ... }]; }
Kotlin+KTX
private fun addRating(restaurantRef: DocumentReference, rating: Float): Task<Void> { // Create reference for new rating, for use inside the transaction val ratingRef = restaurantRef.collection("ratings").document() // In a transaction, add the new rating and update the aggregate totals return db.runTransaction { transaction -> val restaurant = transaction.get(restaurantRef).toObject<Restaurant>()!! // Compute new number of ratings val newNumRatings = restaurant.numRatings + 1 // Compute new average rating val oldRatingTotal = restaurant.avgRating * restaurant.numRatings val newAvgRating = (oldRatingTotal + rating) / newNumRatings // Set new restaurant info restaurant.numRatings = newNumRatings restaurant.avgRating = newAvgRating // Update restaurant transaction.set(restaurantRef, restaurant) // Update rating val data = hashMapOf<String, Any>( "rating" to rating, ) transaction.set(ratingRef, data, SetOptions.merge()) null } }
Java
private Task<Void> addRating(final DocumentReference restaurantRef, final float rating) { // Create reference for new rating, for use inside the transaction final DocumentReference ratingRef = restaurantRef.collection("ratings").document(); // In a transaction, add the new rating and update the aggregate totals return db.runTransaction(new Transaction.Function<Void>() { @Override public Void apply(@NonNull Transaction transaction) throws FirebaseFirestoreException { Restaurant restaurant = transaction.get(restaurantRef).toObject(Restaurant.class); // Compute new number of ratings int newNumRatings = restaurant.numRatings + 1; // Compute new average rating double oldRatingTotal = restaurant.avgRating * restaurant.numRatings; double newAvgRating = (oldRatingTotal + rating) / newNumRatings; // Set new restaurant info restaurant.numRatings = newNumRatings; restaurant.avgRating = newAvgRating; // Update restaurant transaction.set(restaurantRef, restaurant); // Update rating Map<String, Object> data = new HashMap<>(); data.put("rating", rating); transaction.set(ratingRef, data, SetOptions.merge()); return null; } }); }
Using a transaction keeps your aggregate data consistent with the underlying collection. To read more about transactions in Cloud Firestore, see Transactions and Batched Writes.
Limitations
The solution shown above demonstrates aggregating data using the Cloud Firestore client library, but you should be aware of the following limitations:
- Security - Client-side transactions require giving clients permission to update the aggregate data in your database. While you can reduce the risks of this approach by writing advanced security rules, this may not be appropriate in all situations.
- Offline support - Client-side transactions will fail when the user's device is offline, which means you need to handle this case in your app and retry at the appropriate time.
- Performance - If your transaction contains multiple read, write, and update operations, it could require multiple requests to the Cloud Firestore backend. On a mobile device, this could take significant time.
- Write rates - this solution may not work for frequently updated aggregations because Cloud Firestore documents can only be updated at most once per second. Additionally, If a transaction reads a document that was modified outside of the transaction, it retries a finite number of times and then fails. Check out distributed counters for a relevant workaround for aggregations which need more frequent updates.
Solution: Write-time aggregation with Cloud Functions
If client-side transactions are not suitable for your application, you can use a Cloud Function to update the aggregate information each time a new rating is added to a restaurant:
Node.js
exports.aggregateRatings = functions.firestore .document('restaurants/{restId}/ratings/{ratingId}') .onWrite(async (change, context) => { // Get value of the newly added rating const ratingVal = change.after.data().rating; // Get a reference to the restaurant const restRef = db.collection('restaurants').doc(context.params.restId); // Update aggregations in a transaction await db.runTransaction(async (transaction) => { const restDoc = await transaction.get(restRef); // Compute new number of ratings const newNumRatings = restDoc.data().numRatings + 1; // Compute new average rating const oldRatingTotal = restDoc.data().avgRating * restDoc.data().numRatings; const newAvgRating = (oldRatingTotal + ratingVal) / newNumRatings; // Update restaurant info transaction.update(restRef, { avgRating: newAvgRating, numRatings: newNumRatings }); }); });
This solution offloads the work from the client to a hosted function, which means your mobile app can add ratings without waiting for a transaction to complete. Code executed in a Cloud Function is not bound by security rules, which means you no longer need to give clients write access to the aggregate data.
Limitations
Using a Cloud Function for aggregations avoids some of the issues with client-side transactions, but comes with a different set of limitations:
- Cost - Each rating added will cause a Cloud Function invocation, which may increase your costs. For more information, see the Cloud Functions pricing page.
- Latency - By offloading the aggregation work to a Cloud Function, your app will not see updated data until the Cloud Function has finished executing and the client has been notified of the new data. Depending on the speed of your Cloud Function, this could take longer than executing the transaction locally.
- Write rates - this solution may not work for frequently updated aggregations because Cloud Firestore documents can only be updated at most once per second. Additionally, If a transaction reads a document that was modified outside of the transaction, it retries a finite number of times and then fails. Check out distributed counters for a relevant workaround for aggregations which need more frequent updates.